Six Ways Technology is Disrupting the Courts
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union…
The United States Constitution was not simply an epiphany that sprang from the mind of one or even a small group of brilliant thinkers. Instead, it was the result of years of numerous attempts, re-works and compromises. The New Jersey Plan, the Virginia Plan, the Connecticut Compromise—what the founders ultimately created leveraged the collective experience of centuries of nation-building, successes and failures, dating all the way back to 200 B.C. (checks and balances of the Roman Empire the very beginnings of the idea of multiple, separate branches of government) to create a single, timeless and enduring framework that would be the foundation for a new form of democracy. Interestingly, when he did finally sign the Constitution, Benjamin Franklin said that he accepted it “because I expect no better and because I am not sure that it is not the best!”
In this new federalist system, the judicial branch was one of the three branches of government established to maintain checks and balances among the institutions set in place to govern daily life in the new nation.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first case until 1792, over 200 years ago, when “daily life” meant something altogether different than it means today. Still on the horizon were electricity and batteries, the steam engine and the telegraph machine. Today, we combine the descendants of these technologies into brand new phenomena—think self-driving, electric cars with on-board internet access. In short, the way we interact with the world has changed exponentially since the dawn of the American judiciary. So how do courts leverage new technologies amidst such explosive and fundamental changes in society while still upholding the law of the land?
Technology’s Role in the Courts
The application of technology to our courts presents significant, measurable opportunities—but it’s not without challenges. The judicial and legal professions are traditional, based on hundreds of years of practice and process. Like other areas of government, courts have been slower to change and adapt to innovative, disruptive technologies. Because of this, solutions providers must bear several factors in mind when balancing emerging technologies with the judiciary’s lengthy history of slow, incremental adoption:
- Automation is not modernization. We can’t just keep putting today’s process and court records on computers and claiming that it represents modernization. Technology can be so much more to the courts than the simple automation of rote processes. It can be a multiplier, and it can enable new and different approaches and modes of thinking. We should be leveraging new capabilities that disrupt norms and test convention—a mentality we call “1+1=3.” Innovation does not occur unless we question what we believe to be true.
- New tech can make courts faster. Technology done right can bend time in ways we haven’t thought of yet. We should be able to significantly accelerate the pace of the court system while simultaneously increasing the quality and the timeliness of the decisions rendered. Technology can allow courts to adapt more quickly to changes in laws, society and demographics by taking advantage of configurable platforms, business rules engines and workflows. We should demand that advancements be implemented quickly and have the flexibility to scale and extend to problems we haven’t even discovered yet.
- Technology should make courts more democratic. Our court systems and records must be accurate, secure and accessible all at the same time. This should be table stakes for any court solutions. Make the right information available to the right person at the right time—even 24x7. Justice can’t be served without that.
- It can make courts more mobile. We need technology to be platform- and location-agnostic. One-dimensional systems are a thing of the past. Our stakeholders are mobile, and they’re equipped with multiple devices. Again: table stakes.
- Data analytics can increase fairness. The amount of data we move and store is growing exponentially. We need data analytics technology to get more business value out of that data—trends, correlations and patterns that are only machine recognizable but that will enhance the ability of our courts to deliver fair and impartial justice
- These new systems can (and must) be seamless and secure. Finally, yet importantly, we need to be able to better integrate new solutions into existing systems, leveraging APIs and web services for better data interfaces and more deliberate movement and management of data. Systems must be consistent, accurate, timely, and—most of all—secure.
Disrupting the Courts
To date, we have just seen a steady pace of continued, incremental improvements in court technology and process. We need to identify fundamental ways to change the equation by finding those transformational “1+1=3” ideas that leverage technology in more provocative, disruptive ways.
Wave one of technology advancements was automation; wave two will be about leveraging mobile, analytical, cloud and other emerging technologies that enable agility and configurability to dramatically implement different business approaches that serve court constituents and uphold the law of the land.
This content is made possible by our sponsor. The editorial staff of Government Executive was not involved in its preparation.