Trump’s VA Lays Out Plan to Boost Private Sector Care for Veterans
The Trump administration laid out its plans to further integrate private sector health care into the services the Veterans Affairs Department provides for its patients, though the VA’s leader said he had no interest in full-scale privatization.
VA Secretary David Shulkin at a Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing called the new plan the Veterans Coordinated Access Rewarding Experience (Veterans CARE), saying it would overcome challenges that make access to private care arbitrary and cumbersome. At the heart of the new system, Shulkin said, would be allowing a veteran to call a VA doctor and decide in tandem whether to seek care in-house or in the community. If the veteran were seeking a service VA did not offer, if VA could not provide the service in a timely manner or if the local facility was failing to meet metrics for the desired service, the doctor would recommend a private facility.
The system would move away from the current requirements that measure distance from a facility and wait times in determining whether veterans are eligible for community care, Shulkin said. VA’s “high performing integrated network” would, Shulkin said, include the department’s own facilities, federal partners, academic affiliates and community providers. VA would coordinate all of those networks and ensure they maintained patient satisfaction, adequate payment models, positive health care outcomes and a smooth exchange of health information. He also said VA will ease the process for veterans to receive urgent care.
» Get the best federal news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.
VA did not formally roll out its plan for a new health care model, instead providing a framework through Shulkin’s testimony. Addressing one of the major concerns veterans service organizations have voiced during previous conversations on increasing the private sector’s role in providing care, the secretary vowed to deal with all the records and payments directly with the providers. Shulkin acknowledged to the committee VA “can’t do this without your help and without legislation.”
Several Democratic senators, however, while voicing some interest in expanding community care, expressed skepticism toward Shulkin’s blueprint. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., for example, said in regard to any privatization effort that she would “fight them with everything I have.”
Shulkin acknowledged that there are some who wish to privatize the Veterans Health Administration. When the congressionally chartered Commission on Care issued its final report last year, for example, several members refused to sign on because they said it did not go far enough in pushing private care. The leader of that group, Darin Selnick, is now a senior adviser to Shulkin. Still, the secretary said he had no interest in privatizing VHA.
“I am not in support of the goal to shut down the VA system,” Shulkin said, later adding, “This will not be an unfettered choice program.”
He explained that some people have suggested the best approach is to give people a card or a voucher “and let them go where they want to go." (President Trump pitched this very idea on the campaign and the proposal still sits on his campaign’s website.) “Unfettered choice,” Shulkin said, “would lead to the elimination of the VA system.” He added it would leave veterans “out in the community with no one to help” and cost $20 billion more annually than the current system. He said he could envision a system such as the voucher idea someday, but not in 2017.
Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said the system Shulkin was proposing would in fact “put greater pressure on VA and VA health care.” He added no one on his panel wanted to “dissolve VA, do away with VA health care or close anything.” Shulkin has previously said he is looking to close hundreds of buildings, but is not focusing on medical facilities.
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., the committee’s ranking member, noted that Trump’s budget would increase funding for community spending by 33 percent and VA facilities by just 1 percent. To do that, he said, “We’re privatizing the VA.”
Several veterans groups also testified at the hearing, where they generally supported getting rid of “arbitrary” requirements to qualify for private care such as distance from a facility or wait times as long as it was not funded by taking away from earned benefits. They also emphasized that VA’s own services must improve side-by-side with the private sector integration.